Do We Need BETTER Mods?

I saw a thread on whether or not we need more mods, and so I made this thread.

Most of the mods are rational (id say 2 are bad at tops) and make fair choices, but we need more active mods in-game...or no mods at all like stomach said. pre-mod aw best aw

Written by VAGlNEER 2.0, 24.04.2012 at 20:06

Most of the mods are rational (id say 2 are bad at tops) and make fair choices, but we need more active mods in-game...or no mods at all like stomach said. pre-mod aw best aw

See- the mods were introduced around the same time a large influx of *chan players and the likes appeared. You honestly think the days where Vafika would spam "VAFIKA STRONG" on [gl] were the best? You can't have a successful Nation without enforcing it's rules; Utopia is impossible without total assimilation and no diversity whatsoever, you can't have a perfect game without perfect players, and we're nowhere near perfect.

The current Mods do their job as best as they can (mostly). I'll admit, sometimes they make irrational or somewhat disturbing choices, but for the most part, they do their job well for the privileges that they had taken away to get it. Yes, before they were Mods they could act like you and me, but now they cannot diverge into simple fun, and must be role models for the community; something not easy to achieve. Pinheiro for example, he's one of the oldest Mods still around regular time, yet as a role model he's still Pin, meaning he's good at what he does and above all acts as a great friend and leader. However, once you start taking Mods in who just want representation, you lose this Role Model persona and enter stages of corruption, and eventually, death of the Website.

What we really need is BETTER threads.

but no we do not need better mods

Sorry fruit, I could see that you replied, yet I have you blocked on the forums. Sorry!

The mods are fine. I've talked to a mod and he told me that they have to be online in order to get reports, unless messaged. We need a more active community who follows and helps to enforce the rules. It's our fault not theirs. That saying, I think our community is fine. People just exaggerate the flaws, just like anything else.

'The mods are fine. I've talked to a mod and he told me that they have to be online in order to get reports, unless messaged. We need a more active community who follows and helps to enforce the rules. It's our fault not theirs. That saying, I think our community is fine. People just exaggerate the flaws, just like anything else.'

>more active community who follows and helps to enforce the rules




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


HA!

like thats ever going to happen

Don't see the point of this question...... We always need something better..... Each one have a different definition of better but no one will refuse to get better moderators........ No matter if you hate or love the actual mods, you can't refuse an improvement

I prefer the mod who turn a blind eye to my inane trolling and complete brashness.

So currently, the mods are doing swell In my books.

Written by the equalizer, 24.04.2012 at 22:13

'The mods are fine. I've talked to a mod and he told me that they have to be online in order to get reports, unless messaged. We need a more active community who follows and helps to enforce the rules. It's our fault not theirs. That saying, I think our community is fine. People just exaggerate the flaws, just like anything else.'

>more active community who follows and helps to enforce the rules




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


HA!

like thats ever going to happen

And having perfect mods. Like that's ever going to happen.

No, what we need is better manners. Our mods are perfectly fine.

Written by Amok, 25.04.2012 at 05:07

No, what we need is better manners. Our mods are perfectly fine.

i didnt make this thread to critisize our current mods, i just made it to see what people think

We had these kind of topics a lot of times.