05.02.2020 - 20:57
I think if you buff Blitz you need to buff RA, maybe adding +1 or + 2 of attack to all units. I guess that could motivate people to start playing RA or alteast a while to test it.
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
05.02.2020 - 21:21
RA does not need buffed. It's literally called "relentless attack"... who the fuck wouldn't want that strategy, it sounds menacing
---- Happiness = reality - expectations
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
05.02.2020 - 21:44
bad to attack and bad to defend
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
06.02.2020 - 02:51
+1 defense and +1 attack to infantry with RA tanks would do the trick. It would completely negate PD tank bonuses.
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
06.02.2020 - 10:46
I do not usually stand up for any startegies but Buffing the attack to end the walling? Lirbur has joined the room
---- http://prntscr.com/omka79 http://prntscr.com/n1ymiv Tacent quibbus Italia noverca est Lirbur: therapy for england claims of superiority Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyvoWzq3EM Lirbur: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S8tP9wu2W0
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 00:50
Any updates on this?
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 01:06
I have my plans. You'll find out soon
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 09:43
Not at all, buffed main attack units for only 90 is a big deal.
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 12:28
I hope op ra isn't coming back. That's worse than op ds. The op ra/blitz meta in 2015/16 was the worst meta I've seen.
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 13:47
+1 range to milita is the consensus agreement so far, its a very mild buff.
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 14:26
Tank general yall, tank general is coming. RA will be left in the dumpster
---- We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 14:55
If I have to buff RA, I would maybe make +1 attack to tank or maybe having even less price for tank, that yes I would start playing. RA turk but also, I heard on scenario RA is not a bad strat, idk about that since im not a scenario player, but + 1 range to militia is not a high buff I think. I changed a bit my mind of the thing I put up there.
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 15:50
Nothing is set in stone for RA as of right now. We are still trying to make it not as busted as DS but not as weak as it is today. Especially in the later game stages.
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 16:15
A unit with attack 9 and range 8 for just 90? That's crazy. Also increasing its attack would boost the collateral damage that it does on cities.
Right now you are able to make a huge swarm of tanks, just imagine if the price gets lower...
In my experience, RA is great for scenarios.
As RA, the main defensive unit (Infantry) costs 90 and have -1 defence, it's weak and expensive. Militia doesn't have any nerfs, it is a solid 3/4 that costs 30, and with +1 range you may be able to move it around your cities and improve you defence capabilities without affecting your economy.
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
10.03.2020 - 16:17
Mmmmm, true,
----
Loading...
Loading...
|
|
12.03.2020 - 10:00
Loading...
Loading...
|
Are you sure?