Two new strat ideas

More Manpower:
+1 reinforcement in all cities with default 1 reinforcement and +1 extra reinforcement in Capital every reinforcement turn but +15 cost for all units(?)


Economist:
income would be 60%(Original 50%) for cities on your territory and 15%(Original 10%) on foreign territory. The turn by turn increase is +25% on your territory until 100% and +5%(Original 2%) afterwards, up to the total of 160%(Original 150%). The turn by turn increase on foreign territory is +2.5%(Original 5%), and the maximum is 70%(Original 50%).

At the cost of:
-1 attack for main offensive units
-2 range for main defensive units
-2 critical for all units
-1 range for secondary defensive unis
-2 HP for all transport units
But:
+3 view for all units

I like the idea , it would be nice to see how this would work out in the test server

Too complicated

Useless to have more reinf if u got no money to buy +15 cost troops zz

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 04:20

Too complicated

Which part?

Interesting ideas tbh

Written by Froyer, 04.01.2019 at 07:52

Useless to have more reinf if u got no money to buy +15 cost troops zz

Maybe +10 or higher maintenance cost?
I see that strat like iron fist, good for smaller maps not so much for a long game

Written by DeepFriedUnicorn, 04.01.2019 at 08:34

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 04:20

Too complicated

Which part?

economy one

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 13:22

Written by DeepFriedUnicorn, 04.01.2019 at 08:34

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 04:20

Too complicated

Which part?

economy one

That's how Economy works in the game;
https://atwar-game.com/faq.php?faq_id=15

I Just modified the percentages to be able to recover income quickly and make it more efficient at the cost of weaker units. Of course it definitely may need some tweaks, but I think it could work as a strategy

Written by DeepFriedUnicorn, 04.01.2019 at 14:17

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 13:22

Written by DeepFriedUnicorn, 04.01.2019 at 08:34

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 04:20

Too complicated

Which part?

economy one

That's how Economy works in the game;
https://atwar-game.com/faq.php?faq_id=15

I Just modified the percentages to be able to recover income quickly and make it more efficient at the cost of weaker units. Of course it definitely may need some tweaks, but I think it could work as a strategy

i think imp is already a good enough econ strat. im pretty sure the percentage changes will make the strat difficult to implement and harder for users to understand. strat should be simple but unique.

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 14:45

Written by DeepFriedUnicorn, 04.01.2019 at 14:17

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 13:22

Written by DeepFriedUnicorn, 04.01.2019 at 08:34

Written by boywind2, 04.01.2019 at 04:20

Too complicated

Which part?

economy one

That's how Economy works in the game;
https://atwar-game.com/faq.php?faq_id=15

I Just modified the percentages to be able to recover income quickly and make it more efficient at the cost of weaker units. Of course it definitely may need some tweaks, but I think it could work as a strategy

i think imp is already a good enough econ strat. im pretty sure the percentage changes will make the strat difficult to implement and harder for users to understand. strat should be simple but unique.

Yeah I did think that when I was drafting it up but imp doesn't change the economy only cost of all units. But I think strategies should be unique and game changing not simple

Interesting but i think the weaknesses are too big compared to the benefits.

Written by Apocalypse, 05.01.2019 at 01:36

Interesting but i think the weaknesses are too big compared to the benefits.

Then we test and then tweak

would be nice to test em out, cos idk how economist would work, sounds kinda weak with all those nerfs

Yea these are interesting i agree, I'll add them to a list im compiling to discuss new strategies

As I read this post again, I do see the attractive nature of these suggestions.

I imagine that the game engine has some variables for population recovery that could be increased and/or increase the percentages. That could be interesting. I'm not sure what a reasonable tradeoff would be.

The additional reinforcements could be worthwhile, as well. Again, tradeoffs would have to be thought through...

I was thinking of a defensive strat that increased the defense bonuses of all units to +2 in defense lines and cities in exchange for -1 range.

I really want to see Buildings implemented!!
fortress (+defense or +HP for all units in city)
economy (unit cost reduction)
factory (+reinforcements)
maybe a radar installation (+++ view range)