Perfect Defense need change

The information of this post avoids my personal upgrades in the math
I am a perfect defnse player and see it is a good strategy to defend but i say that a change on it would be better
A infantry unit have 70 standard cost with perfect defense it low to 60 and 1 point bonus aganinist tank armies
It only have 4 attack always i am one of the perfect defense players that suggest the infantry with perfect defense should have +1 attack and more cost
I would prefer a 5 attack 7 defense for 70 cost rather than the actual 4 attack 6 defense for 60 cost cause the best defense is often a good attack
I suggest that you quit one point more of attack to the tank unit in perfect defense
Perfect defense is intended to defend but should not be useless to attack

No thanks mate, that would ruin expansions, cash management, and would make inf spam op.

I could get behind the range being same as normal and +crit but +1 att would make it to op

What you describe is almost what lucky bastard is, and it will be nerfed because it's too strong.. so no.

Written by Apocalypse, 13.11.2018 at 14:51

What you describe is almost what lucky bastard is, and it will be nerfed because it's too strong.. so no.

On point as always.

This guy makes some good points.

I only want a pd with a infantry not useless for attackin i tired of havin to use tank for attack they costly and not good

Written by Apocalypse, 13.11.2018 at 14:51

What you describe is almost what lucky bastard is, and it will be nerfed because it's too strong.. so no.

I do not demand critic damage and i never use lucky baSTArb a +1 attack on infantry will not do it overpowered

Written by MrPhobos, 13.11.2018 at 12:26

I could get behind the range being same as normal and +crit but +1 att would make it to op

No an infantry have to get less range than normal in pd

Written by smegma lover, 13.11.2018 at 09:26

No thanks mate, that would ruin expansions, cash management, and would make inf spam op.

says a bliztkrieg

Written by Alphamon, 15.11.2018 at 03:02

Written by smegma lover, 13.11.2018 at 09:26

No thanks mate, that would ruin expansions, cash management, and would make inf spam op.

says a bliztkrieg

I like how you're trying to fight and change the competitive community, despite being a R7 and a ww1 player.

Written by smegma lover, 15.11.2018 at 05:50

Written by Alphamon, 15.11.2018 at 03:02

Written by smegma lover, 13.11.2018 at 09:26

No thanks mate, that would ruin expansions, cash management, and would make inf spam op.

says a bliztkrieg

I like how you're trying to fight and change the competitive community, despite being a R7 and a ww1 player.

i try to ignore newbs like these cause i think they will realise the flaws in their recommendations when they rank up and play longer.

I am not new and i play all type of games Sol
I play ffa, roleplay, farms the war to end all wars scenarios and normal map
i played a lot in each
you cannot just say me i am a type of player cause i play all

Written by Alphamon, 15.11.2018 at 16:47

I am not new and i play all type of games Sol
I play ffa, roleplay, farms the war to end all wars scenarios and normal map
i played a lot in each
you cannot just say me i am a type of player cause i play all

well that seems to have silenced the madding crowd !

It seems i watch careful

just shut upppp

Written by Guest, 17.11.2018 at 00:25

Agreed: not cause it's a good idea, but because might as well make some stupid change since like 15 people play this game anymore, game's even more dead than usual; may require drastic stupid measures to get things going and people complainin' tho even this i doubt will make a difference lol

suggest a form to revive atWar which do not include overpowein strategies i can not