Be able to quit duel 1st turn without loosing

Players should be able to quit duel in the first turn of it without loosing it.
It is already the case in cw and it's good stuff.

Sometimes, host start and you don't have the good strat but you can't do nothing about it.
Sometimes you just weren't ready at the time it started.
Sometimes you don't agree with picks.

I don't think it would be really hard to do that and i don't see why anyone wouldn't agree to it

<3

- both players should have hold buttons in duels
- draw possibility if both players agree

Support either ^^. anything along these lines would be nice.

Support

Agreee support
laochra is hot

Let's have all those stuff then

Written by Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:32

You are a joke.

You not have the balls to use your main to bitch at other players?

Written by Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:40

Written by Sun Tsu, 09.03.2015 at 09:38

Written by Guest, 09.03.2015 at 09:32

You are a joke.

You not have the balls to use your main to bitch at other players?

Everybody relevant knows who I am. Also are you this guy's mom or why do you even comment?

Nobody know who you are, and no I am not Zone's parent, just wondering why you are using your alt and being a narb hiding behind it, like a pussy. That's all.

I don't know who you are but i dont truely care.
Anyway Goblin idea is good.
I don't see the point to come here and bitch about that idea.
Now please explain me in what way being able to leave 1st turn without loosing is bad idea. What are the bad effects huh ?

Written by Sun Tsu, 09.03.2015 at 09:43

Nobody know who you are, and no I am not Zone's parent, just wondering why you are using your alt and being a narb hiding behind it, like a pussy. That's all.

Nice argument. Any way you could put more insults in your next post?

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 09:51

I don't see the point to come here and bitch about that idea.
Now please explain me in what way being able to leave 1st turn without loosing is bad idea. What are the bad effects huh ?

Well the point is uttering my opinion, this is what a forum is for by the way.
Not being content with one's picks is no legitimate reason to leave a game. You picked, so play.

Attention people! I am selling chocobanalol's real identity for 100 elo, anyone?
Common its a bargain and you know it

You didn't answered my question.
I guess it shows everything. Plz show your opinion on the idea. Not on a detail.
You're not showing a usefull opinion there since you contest a reason of leaving ( Which is absolutely the main thing of this thread) and not the idea of this subject.
So now either quit the post or give a good answer

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 10:47

You didn't answered my question.
I guess it shows everything. Plz show your opinion on the idea. Not on a detail.
You're not showing a usefull opinion there since you contest a reason of leaving ( Which is absolutely the main thing of this thread) and not the idea of this subject.
So now either quit the post or give a good answer

It is hard for me to make sense of your English, so I do not really understand what you are trying to say.
I answered your question in my post above. I will try to rephrase: Your idea as posted is bad, there is no legitimate reason to cancel a duel in the first turn. A hold button as sugested by Goblin resolves your first two points, and your third point is a joke.

Well if there is no legitimate reason of cancelling a duel in first turn why a hold button for both is needed ?
I mean that of course they are scenarios when there are legitimate reasons of cancelling a duel in first turn.
And a Hold Button would usefull to prevent those situations.
Being able to quit duel first turn is just an other idea. Btw it's just the same one as in cws.

About pick let's imagini someone picks uk and other ukr and unhold it is so unfair picks that i would be likely to cancel duel.

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 13:35

About pick let's imagini someone picks uk and other ukr and unhold it is so unfair picks that i would be likely to cancel duel.

I must say that you must resign and fight whatever the other guy picks. If you felt like you could have picked something better then just pick it, take advantage of you being first to pick, do not wait for compassion.

It's just about agreements.
Imagine you say west.
You get first pick and go UK and other goes ukr and unhold.
It's just to prevent those situation.

In anyways in my list of reason for this change. The pick was the last issue.

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 13:35

Well if there is no legitimate reason of cancelling a duel in first turn why a hold button for both is needed ?
I mean that of course they are scenarios when there are legitimate reasons of cancelling a duel in first turn.
And a Hold Button would usefull to prevent those situations.
Being able to quit duel first turn is just an other idea. Btw it's just the same one as in cws.

About pick let's imagini someone picks uk and other ukr and unhold it is so unfair picks that i would be likely to cancel duel.

How is canceling a duel the same as holding it for a few seconds?
Oh really? I do not think so.
Yes, a hold button would indeed be useful. I wrote this multiple times, so what are you trying to do at the moment?
In the past you could cancel a duel in the first turn. The way it is now was implemented specifically as a means to discourage players from doing what you are trying to bring back.
If you joined a duel, you already explicitly confirmed that what you wanted to play was really a duel. This message even has its own window. If you picked a country, you had time to check the game-settings, so you also agreed with those.
The only legitimate point of worry is that if you picked first, the game-owner can start the game immediately after picking his country, making you unable to change your strategy in respect to his pick. Hence a hold-button.
Every other 'reason' is just you being a pussy about things that you already agreed on beforehand and wouldn't have said anything about if it was the other person in your position.

Written by RaulPB, 09.03.2015 at 13:38

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 13:35

About pick let's imagini someone picks uk and other ukr and unhold it is so unfair picks that i would be likely to cancel duel.

I must say that you must resign and fight whatever the other guy picks. If you felt like you could have picked something better then just pick it, take advantage of you being first to pick, do not wait for compassion.

This so much.

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 13:44

It's just about agreements.
Imagine you say west.
You get first pick and go UK and other goes ukr and unhold.
It's just to prevent those situation.

In anyways in my list of reason for this change. The pick was the last issue.

So? Do not play this person again then, problem solved. How is 'saying west' even a thing. Learn to improvise and handle situations that aren't 100% sure to turn out in your favor. Children these days.

Now please stop being arrogant i'm just trying to prevent this kind of situation. You talking about improvisation and handling stuff but i bet you not able to win one duel vs me.

And you still didn't answered my question.
In what way be able to quit a duel 1st turn is a bad thing ?

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 15:05

And you still didn't answered my question.
In what way be able to quit a duel 1st turn is a bad thing ?

For starters you wasted your opponents time ...

btw. i dont agree with Cow on picks above ...having first pick can be a huge disadvantage considering there are OP counters in the game and duels shouldn't be based on that.

Never have i lost with anything other then Turkey while playing Ukraine, never ...and all does 1v1 wins where me playing OP shit and were less about my skill level.

Waiting for Duel is 10 min+ ( More 30 min for me ). Picking and first turn is 5 min. That's not really relevent argument

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 15:07

Waiting for Duel is 10 min+ ( More 30 min for me ). Picking and first turn is 5 min. That's not really relevent argument

How is your's a valid one? ... and beside you waste your own time while waiting for a duel not someone elses.

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 15:04

Now please stop being arrogant i'm just trying to prevent this kind of situation. You talking about improvisation and handling stuff but i bet you not able to win one duel vs me.

How is this relevant in this discussion?

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 15:05

And you still didn't answered my question.
In what way be able to quit a duel 1st turn is a bad thing ?

See what Goblin said. Once the game starts, you agreed to play it. A duel is a two player experience, since your legitimate points are easily resolved by implementing a hold-button, the simple arguments that by leaving the game after it started you are (a) wasting your opponent's time and (b) every reason to quit a game after picking countries is of selfish nature, are enough to justify that being punished (by losing the game and the appropriate ELO) for doing so is perfectly fine.

I think you didn't understand my point. The thing is when the Host start the duel without asking you. Ofc Goblin solution is a good one there's no problem about it. i was giving another solution ( AS THE ONE WE ACTUALLY HAVE IN CW's )
Now plz stop hating

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 15:20

I think you didn't understand my point. The thing is when the Host start the duel without asking you. Ofc Goblin solution is a good one there's no problem about it. i was giving another solution ( AS THE ONE WE ACTUALLY HAVE IN CW's )
Now plz stop hating

Weaseling out of the argument is really the only thing for you to do after all. Since you aren't even addressing my points when answering I accept your surrendering.

Surrending about what ? There's nothing about honour there. Here the subject is just to improve the game.
I agree that Goblin proposition is real good, even better than mine.
But i'm just saying results of both are the same. I don't see any need of hating like you do.
And again my point is stop the duel starting without agree of both and the consequences it has.

Written by Zone, 09.03.2015 at 16:02

Surrending about what ? There's nothing about honour there. Here the subject is just to improve the game.
I agree that Goblin proposition is real good, even better than mine.
But i'm just saying results of both are the same. I don't see any need of hating like you do.
And again my point is stop the duel starting without agree of both and the consequences it has.

I simply stated my opinion and elaborated. You must be rather young if you confuse disagreement with hating.