Combat choices

So basicly would you rather go in close combat with sword, axe, spear, knife etc, or more ranged combat, like muscets and shiie, or totaly crazy modern times where death can come from nowhere.

I'd definetly avoid WW1 lunacy (high casualties, easy to die).
Most likely I would pick medieval - open battles were not that common, mostly sieges, so you either hide inside the walls or camp outside the walls. And starve.

Ww2 to fight for saschas people

Medieval. Kiting european dogs with my horse archers

Written by tempest (bw fan), 13.11.2024 at 14:52

Ww2 to fight for saschas people

In WW2 I'd be in Bulgarian army, do absolutely nothing (commiting war crimes is optional) and when Soviets come surrender and switch sides at the very end of the war.

Written by BLACKMETAL3199, 14.11.2024 at 08:54

Medieval. Kiting european dogs with my horse archers

Written by Your Laki, 15.11.2024 at 07:40

Written by BLACKMETAL3199, 14.11.2024 at 08:54

Medieval. Kiting european dogs with my horse archers

Modern easily, casualties are at an all time low, much higher chances of surviving, better medicine and above all at least you get supplied food on a regular basis.
And while death can come from everywhere, im sure its an easier death being blow up by a drone than it is getting hacked to bits by a peasant with an axe.